What Is Psychological Safety?
Psychological safety is a shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking. Learn why Google found it was the #1 factor in team effectiveness.
Psychological safety is a shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking. It's the confidence that you won't be punished, humiliated, or rejected for speaking up with questions, concerns, ideas, or mistakes.
The concept was developed by Harvard professor Amy Edmondson through her research on medical teams. She discovered that the best-performing hospital units actually reported MORE errors than poorly-performing ones. Not because they made more mistakes, but because they felt safe enough to discuss them openly.
This isn't about being comfortable or avoiding difficult conversations. It's the opposite. Psychological safety creates the conditions where people can have uncomfortable conversations productively.
Psychological Safety Definition
The formal definition: psychological safety is a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking.
This definition has three important elements:
- Shared belief — it's a team-level phenomenon, not an individual trait
- Interpersonal risk — it's about the social consequences of speaking up
- Team safety — it exists within a specific team context, not organisation-wide
Psychological safety exists on a spectrum. Teams can have high, moderate, or low psychological safety, and this can change over time based on leadership behaviour, team dynamics, and organisational context.
Psychological safety is not about being nice. It's about giving candid feedback, openly admitting mistakes, and learning from each other.
— Amy Edmondson, Harvard Business School
The Neuroscience Behind Psychological Safety
Understanding why psychological safety matters requires understanding how our brains respond to social threat.
The amygdala and threat response
When we perceive social threat, whether from a dismissive comment, a public critique, or fear of looking incompetent, our amygdala activates the fight-flight-freeze response. This happens in milliseconds, before conscious thought.
The physiological response includes:
- Cortisol and adrenaline flood the system
- Blood flow redirects away from the prefrontal cortex
- Higher cognitive functions (creativity, problem-solving, collaboration) become impaired
- Defensive behaviours emerge: withdrawal, aggression, or rationalisation
The impact on performance
When people feel psychologically unsafe, they operate in a diminished cognitive state. They focus on self-protection rather than contribution. They hold back ideas, avoid risks, and cover up mistakes rather than learning from them.
The opposite is also true. When people feel safe, their prefrontal cortex remains active. They can think clearly, take creative risks, admit uncertainty, and engage in genuine collaboration.
What Psychological Safety Is NOT
Psychological safety is often misunderstood. Clarifying what it isn't helps avoid common mistakes in building it.
It's not about being nice
Psychological safety doesn't mean avoiding conflict or difficult conversations. It means having the safety to engage in productive conflict. Teams with high psychological safety often have more disagreements, not fewer, but these disagreements are about ideas rather than personal attacks.
It's not about lowering standards
Creating psychological safety doesn't mean tolerating poor performance or avoiding accountability. High-performing teams combine psychological safety with high standards. The safety enables honest feedback about performance, which drives improvement.
It's not about agreeing with everyone
Psychological safety creates space for disagreement. When people feel safe, they're more likely to voice dissenting opinions, challenge assumptions, and push back on ideas they think are wrong. This leads to better decisions.
It's not a fixed personality trait
Some people naturally feel more confident speaking up than others. But psychological safety is primarily a team-level phenomenon created by leader behaviour and team norms, not individual personality. Even confident individuals will silence themselves in psychologically unsafe environments.
Learn about the research behind psychological safety from Amy Edmondson →
Why Psychological Safety Matters
Psychological safety isn't just a nice-to-have. It's a foundational requirement for high performance, innovation, and learning.
For team performance
Google's Project Aristotle found psychological safety was "by far the most important" factor in team effectiveness. Teams with high psychological safety were more likely to harness the diverse skills and perspectives of their members.
For learning and improvement
Teams can't improve if they can't discuss what's going wrong. Psychological safety enables the honest conversations about mistakes, failures, and problems that drive continuous improvement.
For innovation
Innovation requires risk-taking. People need to feel safe proposing ideas that might fail, challenging the status quo, and experimenting with new approaches. Without psychological safety, teams default to safe, incremental thinking.
For employee wellbeing
Working in psychologically unsafe environments is stressful. The constant vigilance required to avoid making mistakes or saying the wrong thing takes a toll on mental health. Psychological safety reduces this cognitive load and enables people to bring their full selves to work.
Building Psychological Safety in Your Team
Understanding what psychological safety is marks the first step. The next challenge is building it within your specific team context.
Key factors that influence psychological safety:
- Leader behaviour — how leaders respond to mistakes, questions, and dissent
- Team norms — the unwritten rules about what's acceptable
- Organisational context — the broader culture and systems
- Individual relationships — the trust between specific team members
See practical examples of psychological safety in action →
About the author
Ashley Leach is Founder of Leda. Leda's leadership development methodology was co-developed with Professor Anne Lytle (Monash Business School, Kellogg PhD) and has been recognised by AACSB's Innovations That Inspire. The platform has supported thousands of emerging leaders across Australia and New Zealand, with completion rates of 88-98% compared to 3-15% for typical digital learning.
Frequently Asked Questions
They're related but distinct. Trust is typically between two individuals. Psychological safety is a shared belief about a team's climate. You can trust specific colleagues while still feeling the team environment is unsafe for speaking up.
Psychological safety without accountability can lead to complacency. The goal is combining high psychological safety with high standards. Edmondson calls this the "learning zone" where teams can both challenge each other and support risk-taking.
Edmondson developed a 7-item survey measuring beliefs like "It is safe to take a risk on this team" and "No one on this team would deliberately undermine my efforts." Anonymous team surveys are the most common measurement approach.
It depends on the starting point and the consistency of leader behaviour. Significant improvement typically takes 3-6 months of sustained effort. It can be destroyed much faster through a single incident of punishing someone for speaking up.